Governance Assurance Review
Check whether governance is strong enough to carry the programme you are trying to deliver.
Check whether governance is strong enough to carry the programme you are trying to deliver.
Delivery can exist without governance being fit for purpose. Scope creep, weak sponsor engagement, inconsistent reporting, and poor change control accumulate quietly. By the time they become visible delivery failures, the cost of correction is significantly higher than the cost of this review.
An independent governance assurance review looks at what is actually in place - not what the programme documents say is in place - and provides leadership with a prioritised, honest assessment of where governance is strong and where it is not.
Review of governance arrangements, decision authority, and escalation protocols against what the programme actually requires.
How scope is defined, how change is controlled, and whether the change control process is actually being followed.
Quality of the RAID log, whether risks are being actively managed, and whether assumptions are being tracked and tested.
Whether the sponsor is genuinely engaged, whether stakeholder communication is timely, and where gaps exist.
Review of the delivery rhythm - whether milestones are meaningful, reporting is accurate, and the board is getting a true picture.
Prioritised recommendations across all governance areas reviewed, with suggested remedial actions
10-slide summary of governance findings suitable for board or sponsor presentation
One-hour session presenting findings to senior leadership with Q&A and challenge
15-question automated survey. RAG status across 6 risk dimensions.
Learn more → BespokeFull PMO infrastructure for multi-workstream delivery.
Learn more → BespokeSenior-led rapid intervention when a programme is slipping.
Learn more →Bespoke scope · Independent · Board-ready output